MOOD : Slightly Angered
nything in this world, this world would not be the way it is today. Nothing would change and we would be different. If Rosa Parks did not fight for "shotgun", where would society be today? So syntactically speaking anger fuels change. Today I wrestle with some "enemies of anger".
Whilst I hate change with all my heart, I do recognize that it must take place. But while I recognize that is must take place, I do not have to be happy about it, nor do I have to like it. In the last post I made comment on the company expelling people that it felt would hinder or be detrimental to the overall success of said company. By doing this, they hope for change. And to secure their hopes and wishes and to ensure that there hopes come to fruition, they bring in people who they feel are able to provide them with the security and enjoyment of this change.
The people who are bought in to the company to preform this know this. And based on everyone's personal need to succeed, these people will do everything in there power to ensure the goal of change is met. Change is ultimately hit with some viscosity... there is a resistance to flow. People fight it. I know I do! I feel in the circumstances that I am put in this past month, is extremely fragile, and is ready to blow at any second. It seems as tho I am the only one looking at the situation in a clear light, everyone else is looking at things threw the smokey fog of a promised light. There is an attribute of a poor leader, and shallow person and frightened superior that I have come to recognize over the past few years. Over the past few years, I have met many of these people... and have noticed that many have a common attribute.
A poor, shallow, weak and frightened person will often cut down someone or something else to make themselves look better. Its like a heavy person, fattening up a friends so that she looks thinner. A weak leader will bash the other, cut it down, do everything in its power to make the other looker weaker than him or herself in order to make them look the the stronger one. It is much easier to weaken another than to strengthen yourself.
Don't take advantage of a succeeding entity, weakening it, to make yourself look stronger. You were given the tools, the information, the assistance to succeed, and you failed to take it in, use it and learn from it, and now you are scrambling! While the strong entity will be there to assist, please don't abuse it. Order your own product, hire your own staff, grow the company on your own.... don't hope for everyone to do it for you! Don't have some other location baby and cater to all your needs with so much as a thank you. For by sitting back and hoping the problems will be cured by back handed operations, and by good will people that want you to succeed, you are ultimately just playing the same game as your predecessor.
In a relationship there has to be taking and giving! And this has to be an even balance by all parties. What one has to remember is that we are one team. We are not competing! And by one location failing, we as a team fail. Just taking, taking and taking gives the impression of an underlying motive to have the other half of the team fail, as to make themselves look like the stronger half. Now, back to the anger! This angers me! Im not sure at whom I am to be angry. Am I to be angry at the one who is destroying single handedly us while not helping his own team, or shall I be angery at my team for bending over for the raping and allowing this to happe? What do you guys think?
This brings me back to my first statement. "Sometimes when we out seek out enemies, when there is more than enough closer to home." Perhaps, I take things too personal and I should just learn to cope with change. ????... ????... ???? Perhaps it is just me that is making myself so angry. Am I angry at the people, the situation, or the change. I have a lot of self searching to do!
I know that holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned.
I suppose it is wise to direct my anger towards problems -- not people; to focus my energies on answers -- not excuses. In a controversy, the instant we feel anger, we have already ceased striving for truth and have begun striving for ourselves. Wow, I just discovered that because I'm angered, I am greedy! I guess I know what I must do! I must find the truth and strive to fulfill it!
.
Sometimes when we out seek out enemies, when there is more than enough closer to home.
There is, in the day and age many things that can anger people. Pollution, global warming, violence, politics, war... the list can go on and on. Anger stems from enemies. This enemy does not have to be a person. And to have an enemy that means you have stood up for something. If no one stood up for a
nything in this world, this world would not be the way it is today. Nothing would change and we would be different. If Rosa Parks did not fight for "shotgun", where would society be today? So syntactically speaking anger fuels change. Today I wrestle with some "enemies of anger".Whilst I hate change with all my heart, I do recognize that it must take place. But while I recognize that is must take place, I do not have to be happy about it, nor do I have to like it. In the last post I made comment on the company expelling people that it felt would hinder or be detrimental to the overall success of said company. By doing this, they hope for change. And to secure their hopes and wishes and to ensure that there hopes come to fruition, they bring in people who they feel are able to provide them with the security and enjoyment of this change.
The people who are bought in to the company to preform this know this. And based on everyone's personal need to succeed, these people will do everything in there power to ensure the goal of change is met. Change is ultimately hit with some viscosity... there is a resistance to flow. People fight it. I know I do! I feel in the circumstances that I am put in this past month, is extremely fragile, and is ready to blow at any second. It seems as tho I am the only one looking at the situation in a clear light, everyone else is looking at things threw the smokey fog of a promised light. There is an attribute of a poor leader, and shallow person and frightened superior that I have come to recognize over the past few years. Over the past few years, I have met many of these people... and have noticed that many have a common attribute.
A poor, shallow, weak and frightened person will often cut down someone or something else to make themselves look better. Its like a heavy person, fattening up a friends so that she looks thinner. A weak leader will bash the other, cut it down, do everything in its power to make the other looker weaker than him or herself in order to make them look the the stronger one. It is much easier to weaken another than to strengthen yourself.
Don't take advantage of a succeeding entity, weakening it, to make yourself look stronger. You were given the tools, the information, the assistance to succeed, and you failed to take it in, use it and learn from it, and now you are scrambling! While the strong entity will be there to assist, please don't abuse it. Order your own product, hire your own staff, grow the company on your own.... don't hope for everyone to do it for you! Don't have some other location baby and cater to all your needs with so much as a thank you. For by sitting back and hoping the problems will be cured by back handed operations, and by good will people that want you to succeed, you are ultimately just playing the same game as your predecessor.
In a relationship there has to be taking and giving! And this has to be an even balance by all parties. What one has to remember is that we are one team. We are not competing! And by one location failing, we as a team fail. Just taking, taking and taking gives the impression of an underlying motive to have the other half of the team fail, as to make themselves look like the stronger half. Now, back to the anger! This angers me! Im not sure at whom I am to be angry. Am I to be angry at the one who is destroying single handedly us while not helping his own team, or shall I be angery at my team for bending over for the raping and allowing this to happe? What do you guys think?
This brings me back to my first statement. "Sometimes when we out seek out enemies, when there is more than enough closer to home." Perhaps, I take things too personal and I should just learn to cope with change. ????... ????... ???? Perhaps it is just me that is making myself so angry. Am I angry at the people, the situation, or the change. I have a lot of self searching to do!
I know that holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned.
I suppose it is wise to direct my anger towards problems -- not people; to focus my energies on answers -- not excuses. In a controversy, the instant we feel anger, we have already ceased striving for truth and have begun striving for ourselves. Wow, I just discovered that because I'm angered, I am greedy! I guess I know what I must do! I must find the truth and strive to fulfill it!
.
No comments:
Post a Comment